Woman in a Dressing Gown is a 1957 British drama film directed by J. Lee Thompson and starring Yvonne Mitchell, Anthony Quayle, Sylvia Syms, and Carole Lesley.[2] The film won four awards at the 7th Berlin International Film Festival including the first ever FIPRESCI Prize and a special mention for "Best Foreign Film".[3] Mitchell won the Silver Bear for Best Actress.[4] The film also won the 1958 Golden Globe Award for Best English-Language Foreign Film.[5]
Woman in a Dressing Gown | |
---|---|
![]() Danish poster | |
Directed by | J. Lee Thompson |
Written by | Ted Willis |
Based on | TV play by Willis |
Produced by | Frank Godwin J. Lee Thompson |
Starring | Yvonne Mitchell Anthony Quayle Sylvia Syms Carole Lesley |
Cinematography | Gilbert Taylor |
Edited by | Richard Best |
Music by | Louis Levy |
Production company | Godwin-Willis Productions |
Distributed by | Associated British-Pathé |
Release date |
|
Running time | 93 minutes |
Country | United Kingdom |
Language | English |
Box office | £450,000 (UK) £1 million (total)[1] |
The screenplay was written by Ted Willis and the cinematographer was Gilbert Taylor. The producer was Frank Godwin.[6]
The film concerns a man who is having an extramarital affair and considers divorce, and his wife's reaction to the affair. Scenes compare and contrast the man's relationship with his wife versus his relationship with his lover. These are not only very different in content, but very different in film style, shots with his lover being in extreme close-up and/or unusually framed shots. Shots of the wife are mainly in wide angle, encompassing the chaotic mess of her house.
The film is considered an example of British social realism, and a prototypical version of Kitchen sink realism. Modern criticism has noted that it was more progressive in the field of gender politics than the British New Wave.
The Prestons are an apparently happy household made up of wife Amy (Yvonne Mitchell), husband Jim (Anthony Quayle) and teenage son Brian (Andrew Ray), living in a cramped flat on a London housing estate. On a Sunday morning she lovingly prepares his cooked breakfast but he announces he has to work.
However, tensions soon become clear. Though she has a breezy, loving character, Amy is a disorganised housewife. She finds it difficult to concentrate enough to tidy or cook properly. Jim is having an affair with a colleague, Georgie (Sylvia Syms), who threatens to break it off unless Jim divorces his wife and leaves his family. He promises that he will do so, and eventually demands a divorce. Amy is shocked and distraught, but vows to improve herself. She borrows ten shillings from her son (who is in his first job) and pawns her engagement ring for three pounds. She then gets her hair done and buys a half bottle of whisky for Jim. She has phoned Jim at work and told him to bring Georgie home. Her plan is foiled when heavy rain starts and ruins her new hair. She gets home looking worse than ever. She pulls her best dress out of storage but rips it putting it on. Her neighbour arrives and they start drinking the whisky. Amy gets drunk and ruins the table.
Brian finds her drunk and becomes angry with his father when he brings Georgie to the house. Jim slaps Brian and he leaves.
After a confrontation she orders Jim and Georgie out of the flat. Jim leaves, but has second thoughts, he tells Georgie it won't work and returns to his wife who is lovingly packing his case. She vows to get rid of her dressing gown.[7]
The film was based on a 1956 ITV Television Playhouse play written by Ted Willis.[8]
The film was one of the most popular at the British box office in 1957.[9] J Lee Thompson later said the film lost money but was well received by critics.[10]
Variety said it "had good b.o. possibilities."[11]
The New York Times said "Paddy Chayefsky would love it."[12]
Jean-Luc Godard wrote "One really has to rack one’s brains to find anything to say about a British film. One wonders why. But that’s the way it is. And there isn’t even an exception to prove the rule. Especially not Woman in a Dressing-gown anyhow, in spite of its acting prize? at the recent Berlin Festival. That just goes to show that the Germans have no idea either.... From beginning to end the film is an incredible debauch of camera movements as complex as they are silly and meaningless."[13]
On the film's rerelease on in 2012, Peter Bradshaw, in a five star review for The Guardian wrote that the film's "proto-kitchen-sink drama goes all the way where Brief Encounter loitered hesitantly....and unlike David Lean's film, this one shows people saying the relevant things out loud. An unmissable rerelease."[14] While Melanie Williams for the BFI Screenonline noted "an important reminder that postwar British realism did not begin with the New Wave, and that the 1950s were not devoid of socially engaged cinema, as is sometimes suggested. Indeed, in the field of gender politics, one could argue that this film is considerably more progressive than the New Wave that superseded it, in its focus on the travails of a middle-aged housewife rather than those of a virile young man."[15]
Willis later adapted the script into a stage play that was very successful.[16]
{{cite book}}
: |first1=
has generic name (help)
Golden Globe Award for Best English-Language Foreign Film | |
---|---|
|